Pages: 1 [2] 3 |
21. Tri Vs KIA - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
brap brap brap
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.03.02 19:38:00
|
22. Next Tournament (formal request) - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
yea ive heard that said before about not having warping. allowing rigs would be a no-brainer, they open up alot more variety in setups, give a greater number of ships a chance for being useful, both of which increase the tacical options.
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.02.28 21:37:00
|
23. Next Tournament (formal request) - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
like wildcat said, not on prizes as thats the one thing that could affect (in theory) the balance of the actual game. but yeah, admissions procedures, match rules ect. basically everything that is purely going to affect the tournament and not the...
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.02.28 16:15:00
|
24. Next Tournament (formal request) - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
well it wouldnt necessarily have to be those exact people, but it makes sense for at least most of the people on it to be veteran players, it would be hard for players without a deep knowlege of the pvp side of game, and tournament pvp at that as ...
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.02.28 15:59:00
|
25. Next Tournament (formal request) - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
chill out, noones trolling just your replies so far were off on a bit of a tangent away from what wildcat was suggesting, implying you wernt quite on the same page as his idea. by involving players with a deep tournament experience, especially f...
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.02.28 15:44:00
|
26. Next Tournament (formal request) - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
i still dont think you get it
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.02.28 15:15:00
|
27. Next Tournament (formal request) - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
yea exactly, hes suggesting a council of players with tournament experience to assist in making the next one more sucessful than this current mess. not some kinda elite team only event.
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.02.28 14:20:00
|
28. We're In? We're Out? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
you couldnt make this up
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.02.26 21:35:00
|
29. Two teams drop out of the Tourney - reserves take their place - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
nevermind the fact that taking part now would be legitimising this farce, two and a half days is not enough time to sort out a team and a strategy unless you want to just fail epically.
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.02.26 20:49:00
|
30. The Red Skull - Tournament Position Auction - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Evil Edna on 26/02/2008 17:07:29 On behalf of Trevedian (Who cannot post) Red Skull was not goin to field a team in the tourneyŕ It was my idea and I paid for it. When I renounced Executorship of Red Skull my only stipulation was th...
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.02.26 17:07:00
|
31. Proposal : Tournament VI - Admission Rules - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
this makes too much sense to ever be considered by the tourney organisers
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.02.25 17:59:00
|
32. The Red Skull - Tournament Position Auction - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
and hows that then? why have yourselves reinstated in the tourney if your members cant/wont make the commitment needed to even be available for matches?
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.02.24 21:03:00
|
33. The Red Skull - Tournament Position Auction - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
good to see they were really worthy of taking a spot when some actual good teams who were prepaired to make the effort to compete couldnt weak
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.02.24 20:00:00
|
34. Say hello to your experts - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
wait, ginger magician is going?
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.01.28 22:38:00
|
35. Who got in? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
or you could, you know, not make overblown examples and fallacious attempts at humour, and, shocker here, help come up with a solution that allows more teams to participate in a workable way, for the benefit of both the tournament as a whole and t...
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.01.23 18:09:00
|
36. tourny needs retroactive changes NOW, not in a few weeks, NOW! - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
theres alot of people on poor teams banging on about peoples lazyness for missing signup time, desperatly happy that they maybe have a chance with alot of the major players not being able to enter
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.01.21 21:59:00
|
37. Why only 40 teams to enter.... surely 64 teams would be better? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
which could be pretty easily made possible by cutting each match down by a few minutes, and having less studio banter without really increasing the broadcast time
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.01.21 15:33:00
|
38. We're In? We're Out? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
youve developed yourself a real attitude for someone whose never done anything of signifcance gutsani
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.01.20 23:06:00
|
39. Who got in? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
ive done nothing but put my view in a calm way in this thread unfortunatly my bitter fanboys couldnt do the same
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.01.20 18:18:00
|
40. Who got in? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Evil Edna on 20/01/2008 15:22:15 awesome i seem to have picked up my own idiot fanboys without even joining bob or evetv and you can notify your alliance exeq as much as you want that signups are coming soon, but they cant be/arn...
- by Evil Edna - at 2008.01.20 15:20:00
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |